FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

""Don’t see what you’re looking for?
Ask your question here

About the QM Rubric and Standards

1. How do I know what the QM Standards are looking for?
2. How does QM use the Rubric to score a course as having met standards? I want to make sure my course “passes.”
3. Can I post a copy of the QM Rubric on our college resource page for faculty to access it?”

About Course Reviews

1. Where can I learn more about how the Course Review Process works?
2. The process involves other faculty looking at my course to make recommendations. Are there requirements for confidentiality?
3. Who are the members of a course review team?
4. What are the eligibility requirements to be a course peer reviewer?
5. Will the review teams for MNSCU institutions be made up of only Peer Reviewers from other MNSCU institutions?

About Roles & Responsibilities

1. What’s the difference between a Campus-IR and a Statewide-IR?
2. What’s the difference between a Peer Reviewer and a Master Reviewer?
3. What’s the difference between a Statewide Subscription & an Affiliate Subscription to Quality Matters?

About Professional Development Opportunities

1. What workshops and courses are offered by QM?
2. What workshops and courses are available at a reduced cost through MOQI?
3. Why does MOQI provide a cost reduction for the APPQMR, PRC and MRC workshops/courses, but not for other workshops offered by QM?
4. What is the difference, if any, between the APPQMR 2-week online workshop and the APPQMR 1-day on-site, f2f workshop?
5. How should I decide whether to take the online or on-site workshop?
6. When are the workshops offered?
7. How do I register for QM professional development workshops and courses?


About the QM Rubric and Standards

1. How do I know what the QM Standards are looking for?

The Quality Matters Standards include statements or explanations called “annotations” that describe in detail what the standard is looking for. Course Peer Review teams use the annotations that are part of each standard to help make a decision about whether or not a standard is met. Faculty course developers can use the annotations to guide them to create course components that meet Quality Matters standards.

2. How does QM use the Rubric to score a course as having met standards? I want to make sure my course “passes”.

First, it’s important to point out that the QM process doesn’t involve involve pass/fail judgments. Instead, the process relies on the team members providing specific guidance based on evidence in the course for the course developer on what might be done to modify the course in order that it will eventually meet standards. There is a clear recognition throughout the process that there are many ways to meet each standard and that no course is perfect. For QM reviewed courses, the goal is to meet an 85% threshold in order to be certified as a quality course. The Quality Matters process is designed to ensure that courses undergoing review will eventually meet expectations at or above the 85% threshold.

3. Can I post a copy of the QM Rubric on our college resource page for faculty to access it?

You are able to post a digital version of the Quality Matters Annotated Rubric on a college Intranet or D2L site that is not public.

You should include a notice that says, “This Rubric and any other Quality Matters materials are copyrighted by Quality Matters. They may be used only by faculty/staff of affiliate subscriber institutions within the statewide Quality Matters subscription in Minnesota. The digital copy of the Rubric is provided for personal reference purposes only and may not be printed and/or distributed. Individuals wishing a print copy should contact their campus Institution Representative.

Back to Top

About Course Reviews

1. Where can I learn more about how the Course Review Process works?

You can read more about the Course Review Process here.

2. The process involves other faculty looking at my course to make recommendations. Are there requirements for confidentiality?

Certified Peer Reviewers are expected to maintain strict confidentiality about the courses they review. They are required to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Quality Matters annually that includes a statement about this specifically.

3. Who are the members of a course review team?

The review is carried out by a team of three certified peer reviewers. On the team, one must be a Master Reviewer and one must be a SME (subject matter expert). Team members can fulfill more than one role. The faculty member is on the team in a consultative role.

4. What are the eligibility requirements to become a course peer reviewer?In order to be a Certified Peer Reviewer, one must have met the following criteria:

  • Successful completion of Applying the Quality Matters Rubric Workshop
  • Successful completion of the Peer Reviewer Course
  • Have current online teaching experience (within the last 18 months)
  • Must have a signed application and MOU on file with QM

In order to become a Certified Master Reviewer, one must have met the following criteria in addition to meeting all of the Peer Reviewer criteria:

  • Must have served on a minimum of two official QM reviews
  • Successful completion of the Master Reviewer Course
  • Must re-certify annually through completion of a Master Reviewer Re-certification course

5. Will the review teams for MnSCU institutions be made up of only Peer Reviewers from other MnSCU institutions?

The MOQI-Managed reviews will use QM-Certified Peer Reviewers and QM-Certified Master Reviewers from the Minnesota Online QM-affiliate institutions to the extent possible. It will not be possible to use exclusively reviewers from within this pool due to the requirement that there be a Subject Matter expert as one of the reviewers on each team. At this point in time, there are not certified reviewers for every discipline within the state.

Back to Top

About Roles & Responsibilities

1. What’s the difference between a Campus-IR and a Statewide-IR?

The Statewide-IR serves as the single point of contact and communication gatekeeper for the entire system; manages the subscription in all areas – policies, procedures, financial issues, contract issues, etc.; advises all system parties about QM and ensures affiliates adhere to contract terms to include intellectual property and copyright issues; and, consults with affiliates for acquisition and implementation of trainings and course reviews. Only the Statewide IRs can arrange for training for the entire statewide system.

The Campus-IR serves as the single point of contact and communication gatekeeper for the institution; manages the subscription in accordance with the system subscriber in all areas – policies, procedures, financial issues, contract issues, etc.; advises the institution about QM and adheres to contract terms to include intellectual property and copyright issues; and, coordinates with the Statewide-IR for acquisition and implementation of trainings and course reviews.

2. What’s the difference between a Peer Reviewer and a Master Reviewer?

Peer Reviewers are experienced online faculty members who have completed the QM Peer Review Certification course. The Master Reviewer is an experienced Peer Reviewer who has completed additional training. The Master Reviewer has additional responsibilities during an official QM Review, including serving as the team chair during an official QM review. They are responsible for facilitating the review, all team communications and serve as the authoritative guide on matters related to application of the QM Rubric and process.

3. What’s the difference between a Statewide Subscription & an Affiliate Subscription to Quality Matters?

Minnesota Online has a Statewide Subscription with Quality Matters. This subscription includes MNSCU, the University of Minnesota and the Department of Education. Each of the MNSCU institutions has been offered the opportunity to become an affiliate subscriber under this Statewide subscription. As part of this affiliate subscription, institutions have identified a campus Institutional Representative to help coordinate the campus QM activities. Campus QM IRs are expected to work through the Statewide QM IRs for acquisition of training or course reviews. More information about subscriptions can be viewed here.

Back to Top

About Professional Development

1. What workshops and courses are offered by QM?
Qualiity Matters offers Implementation Workshops and Courses that include the  Applying the Quality Matters Rubric (APP) Workshop, Peer Reviewer Certification (PRC) Course, Master Reviewer Certification (MRC) Course and Institution Representative Training.

QM also provides Course-focused Workshops, including Designing Your Online Course, Improve Your Online Course, Designing Your Blended Course and Standards-focused Workshops which include Design that Welcomes Your Students, Creating a Foundation with Learning Objectives, Choosing and Using Media Effectively, and Addressing Accessibility. QM Alignment Standards Workshops include Connecting Learning Objectives and Assessments, Link Instructional Materials and Learner Engagement. QM also now offers one workshop focused on Teaching Online, its Teaching Online-An Introduction to Online Delivery.

2. What workshops and courses are available at a reduced cost through MOQI?
Through MOQI faculty/staff in MnSCU Institutions In Minnesota can take one QM Implementation Workshop, Applying the QM Rubric (APP), and two Implementation Courses, the Peer Reviewer Certification (PRC) Course and the Master Reviewer Certification (PRC) Course at a reduced cost—For a limited time (until funding provided by MnOnline this year to support QM implementation runs out), $55 for the APP workshop, $75 for the PRC and $150 for the MRC. There are no pre-requisites to take the APP. However, to take the PRC you must have already successfully completed the APP. To take the MRC, you must already be a QM certified peer reviewer.  For more information, visit   https://www.softchalkcloud.com/lesson/serve/RLVO5IKNU3Xcge/html.

3. Why does MOQI provide a cost reduction for the APPQMR, PRC and MRC workshops/courses, but not for other workshops offered by QM?
While all of the QM workshops and courses are valuable for individual faculty professional development, not all (a) provide important foundational information about what QM is, the QM Rubric and the QM Peer Review Process, (b) help faculty fulfill the pre-requisites to take QM certification courses, (c) provide a pathway for faculty to become peer reviewers, master reviewers or other institutional champions for QM, and (d) help an institution begin to implement Quality Matters on a wider scale.

Key goals of MOQI are to (a) help large numbers of faculty/staff in MnSCU institutions have a clear understanding of what the rubric is and how it can help them design high quality online courses and demonstrate to a wide range of stakeholders that they have quality online and hybrid/blended courses, (b) help as many faculty as desire to, become peer reviewers and master reviewers, and (c) help ensure that as many courses as possible receive recognition as having met QM standards.

The APPQMR workshop, PRC certification course and MRC certification courses are essential to help all institutions achieve these goals.

4. What is the difference, if any, between the APPQMR 2-week online workshop and the APPQMR 1-day on-site, f2f workshop?
If you’re trying to decide whether the online or F2F workshop is best for you:

Two-Week Online APPQMR – This asynchronous workshop is delivered over the course of two weeks by two QM-certified facilitators. In this workshop participants will: (a) Read short lesson materials related to the QM rubric and review process, (b) Take a few short, 10-question quizzes on the material, (c) Apply the QM rubric to a sample online course, (d) Participate in forum discussions related to each of the 8 General Standards, and (e) Apply the QM rubric to a design scenario. It provides an excellent opportunity for faculty to individually consider how the rubric applies to each standard in course development and how the review process works in a course review, exchange ideas and perspectives on course design with colleagues, and gain personal experience applying the rubric.

One-Day On-Site (F2F) APPQMR – This workshop is delivered by one QM-certified facilitator over the course of six hours. In this workshop participants will:  (a) Learn about the QM rubric and review process through presentation materials and activities provided by one QM-certified workshop facilitator, (b) Take one quiz on material presented, (c) Collaboratively apply the QM rubric to a sample online course, and (d) Apply the QM rubric to a design scenario. It provides an excellent opportunity for faculty to gain a general, introductory understanding of the QM rubric and how it might be applied in course development and in the course review process and exchange ideas and perspectives on course design with colleagues.

5. How should I decide whether to take the online or on-site workshop?
The APPQMR online workshop is recommended for faculty who intend to use the rubric to design their own courses, may submit a course for a QM course review in the future, or may decide to become a peer reviewer at some point in the future.  This workshop provides an opportunity to look carefully at a sample course and make personal decisions about whether or not the standards are met, share your findings and reasons for your decisions with colleagues through the discussion threads, receive new ideas and perspectives from colleagues and write recommendations for improvement over the course of the two-week period.  You can work at your own pace but will want to work and post along with colleagues to gain the most benefit from the course.

The APPQMR face-to-face workshop is appropriate for faculty who are interested in learning about the rubric and review process from a more “overview” perspective.  Due to the limited time period, course material is presented by a facilitator and while there is time to for some discussion, due to time-constraints there is limited opportunity to individually practice applying the standards to a sample course.

6. When are the workshops offered?

A complete calendar of all APPQMR workshops (and webinars) offered through MOQI can be found here.

Peer Reviewer courses are offered every week by QM and Master Reviewer courses are offered once a month by QM. All other QM workshops and courses are offered periodically by QM according to the schedule posted on the QM website at https://www.qmprogram.org/qmresources/registration/index.cfm?month=1&year=2013.

7. How do I register for QM professional development workshops and courses?
Registration information for all QM professional development workshops and courses can be found in the Registration Guide  (https://www.softchalkcloud.com/lesson/serve/i8HsdPZftTXYv2/html)

Back to Top


Ask a Question

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s